Rolin Jones

Jacob Anderson

Sam Reid

Assad Zaman

Delainey Hayles

Ben Daniels

Eric Bogosian

Maya Kvetny

Kate Rhodes James

Matej Kricner

A. Zell Williams

Mara LePere-Schloop

Levan Akin

Tom Williams

Heather Bellson

Coline Abert

Kimberley Zaharko

Laura Luckenbaugh

Mark Taylor

Alan Taylor

Shane Munson

Brooke M. Thomas

Jonathan Ceniceroz

Nina Khan

Matthew Stillman

David Minkowski

Esta Spalding

Michelle Ashford

Christopher Rice

Anne Rice

Elizabeth Reily

Mark Johnson

Hannah Moscovitch

Adam O'Byrne

Daniel Hart

Drama

Sci-Fi & Fantasy

"And that's the end of it. There's nothing else"

Interview with the Vampire

AMC Studios

Gran Via Productions

Dwight Street Book Club

United States of America

The first two seasons are perfect. Literally like the best show ever. CINEMATIC MASTERPIECE. Dont listen to the shitty reviews they literally just have bad taste, watch it for yourself and see, you wont be dissapointed. 


_(im iffy so far on the 3rd season which is unfortunate as im sooo fond of the first 2, but i think they were going for a total switch up and a campy comedy, which is true to the book, The Vampire Lestat, and true to the stark and jarring difference going from reading the first book to the second... So im here for the ride lol)_

Typical that this show would be teeming with loser reviews about "Wokeness" newsflash you're watching a tv show based on a book about gay vampires. GOD FORBID a character be poc, absolute crybabies. This show is objectively better than the movie and deeper than the books,as well as being able to be legitimately queer from the get go which, wouldn't you be surprised! Anne rice wasnt able to do at the time due to homophobia. If you're gonna complain about "wokeness" maybe dont be watching possibly the gayest media to exist you absolute weirdos...

This is the first product of a collaboration between **_Anne Rice_** and her son **_Christopher Rice_**(also an author), deciding to rework her own novels as a TV series universe after reclaiming the production rights from Universal Studios. Unfortunately some fans did not get that memo, so have dismissed it as Hollywood "woke crap" that doesn't respect the source material. You'll find many reviews online that go down that route of ignorance, but both the original books, and the reimagined TV show version are examples of how creatity can deliver variations of the same tale that both work within their selective mediums, and happily exist side by side on the shelf. They've since followed it up with The Mayfair Witches, and Talamasca: The Secret Order, but this show is still the best out of the three. The production quality is excellent, costume, make-up and set designs are all peak. But it's the succesful performances, and reimagined plot elements that give the source material a very fresh presentation that eventually takes the familiar journey from the novels, and makes it its own.

Dean

Just another woke crap coming from Holywood. Didn't expect anything good from them nowadays...

So this is one of those titles that IMDb will remove your review if it's not positively glowing.

I'm not sure why, the source material was already really progressive.  It was essentially a story about two Gay men who happen to be vampires... and their violent break up.  But it was subtle, it was artistic, and it had more of a story to tell about good and evil among other things.

Subtle is the key, because in the 2022 version, there is nothing subtle or artistic.  Vampires can't have sex in the novels to up the sexual tension and angst.  In this title I guess they didn't think it would be woke enough if it wasn't 9 and 1/2 Weeks with Vampires. 

And then they changed Louis, which means that they had to change the entire timeline of the title, and that caused a little bit of complications with everything else, because even though there was a strong message about freeing his slaves in the book... they couldn't have it in the movie...

...Because when you are woke things don't need to make any sense.  

And they aged Claudia up, and that presented significant changes and relieved some of what made her character so compelling.

In the end they took a beautiful novel and turned it into cheap fan fiction porn with politics and the people are eating it up.

Because in this day and age, you can't respect the source material, you have to trash it.

I have read Anne Rice's vampire novels, not all of them but enough to get a clear impression of her writing style, characterisations and settings for her work. 

Interview with the Vampire, for me, largely misses the mark on each and every count.The characters don't feel like the Rice's, they lack the personality and finesse, she infused her characters with. The time period/setting is in many respects, off the mark, too. 

Worse still, there's is politic's infused into this work. There's a dash of rather obvious negative Russian messaging and yet more woke-ism, I personally, could have done without. 

Acting is of a high standard. I feel its a genuine shame so much else is off. This could have worked if they had paid closer attention to Rice's actual work and knocked off the unwelcome messaging. 

In short, high production values and decent acting can't save this series from feeling, to this fan at least, nothing like Rice's work. The movie with Brad Pitt and Tom Cruise from the 90's, beautifully captures the essence of Rice's work and is my recommended screen adaptation.

Interview with the Vampire

Cast

News and articles

Reviews

Similar Shows